|
AMSOIL Proves
Superior in Clark County Field Test |
| In
order to demonstrate the effectiveness of AMSOIL
15W-40 Synthetic Heavy Duty Diesel and Marine
Motor Oil and the AMSOIL Dual-Gard filtration
system in reducing operating expenses, AMSOIL
and Direct Dealer Bill Andes began an ongoing
field test in October 1998 with the bus fleet of
the Clark County Board of Mental Retardation &
Developmental Disabilities (MR/DD) in
Springfield, Ohio.
Participating in the field
test are three 1997 International 3800 school
buses, two equipped with International 466
diesel engines and one with an International
466E diesel engine. Each had previously been
running a conventional petroleum-based oil.
|
 |
Prior to starting the
field test, four goals were set:
|
1. |
The
reduction of fuel consumption through the
superior lubricity and reduced viscometric drag
provided by
AMSOIL 15W-40 Synthetic Heavy Duty Diesel and
Marine Motor Oil. Verification of this goal
will be obtained by com-paring previously
documented fuel mileage reports using petroleum
oils with fuel mileage reports of the same
vehicles now using AMSOIL diesel oil. |
|
2. |
The
extension of fluid drain intervals due to the
superior synthetic chemistry and additive system
of AMSOIL Synthetic Heavy Duty Diesel and Marine
Motor Oil, along with the additional efficiency
pro-vided by the AMSOIL Dual-Gard filtration
system. |
|
3. |
The
reduction of maintenance costs due to the
superior wear protection and extended drain
intervals provided by AMSOIL Synthetic Heavy
Duty Diesel and Marine Motor Oil and the AMSOIL
Dual-Gard filtration system. |
|
4. |
Provide the above-mentioned benefits without
com-promising the mechanical integrity of the
equipment. |
Baseline samples of the petroleum oil
already in the crankcase were obtained, tested and
documented. Next, the oil was drained and the engines
flushed with AMSOIL Engine Flush. AMSOIL BMK-12 Filter
Mounts, two BE-110 By-pass Filtration elements and AMSOIL
15W-40 Synthetic Heavy Duty Diesel and Marine Motor Oil were
installed in each vehicle.
Oil samples from each bus are drawn and
tested at 4000-mile intervals, the normal oil drain interval
practiced by MR/DD when using conventional lubricants. Data
obtained from the oil samples serves to determine the
following:
|
1. |
Fluid and vehicle baselines |
|
2. |
The mechanical condition of the
vehicles |
|
3. |
Ability of the equipment to
continue functioning as a demonstration vehicle |
|
4. |
Rate of internal equipment wear |
|
5. |
Serviceability of fluids and
filters |
Once drawn, each oil sample is reviewed in
the areas of elemental analysis (including wear metals,
contaminates and additives), physical properties (including
viscosity, total acid number and total base number) and
contamination (including water, solids, glycol, oxidation,
fuel soot and fuel dilution). Oil condemnation limits vary
due to individual engine idiosyncrasies, operating
conditions and time the fluid has been in service.
|
Bus Number |
Miles on AMSOIL without being
changed |
# of Petroleum oil changes
(based on 4,000-mile interval) |
# of AMSOIL oil changes (based
on proposed
10,000-mile interval) |
|
4 |
45,465 |
12 |
5 |
|
7 |
71,185 |
18 |
8 |
|
22 |
65,776 |
17 |
7 |
Observations
As of May 1, 2001, the
buses had accumulated a total of 182,426 miles without oil
changes, and several benefits associated with running the
AMSOIL products have been realized. First, both labor and
vehicle downtime have been reduced. While using the previous
petroleum-based motor oil, the Clark County Board of MR/DD
was accustomed to changing oil at 4,000-mile intervals. They
now plan to extend their intervals to 10,000 miles and
beyond if supported by oil analysis results. The chart below
shows the comparison figures.
As for the aftermarket full flow oil
filters, the original intention was to change them every
6,000 to 10,000 miles, but after careful review of oil
analysis results, it was determined that because of the
efficiency of the AMSOIL Dual-Gard filtration system,
10,000- to 12,000-mile intervals were easily obtainable on
the full-flow filters.
For demonstration purposes, the BE-110
filter elements remained unchanged for a 2-year period.
However, after review, it was deter-mined that under normal
conditions it would be beneficial to change them after a
40,000- to 50,000-mile interval.
Engine wear rates have decreased
significantly since changing to AMSOIL 15W-40 Synthetic
Heavy Duty Diesel and Marine Motor Oil. High temperature
operating conditions have also been reduced. This leads to
enhanced engine protection, and ultimately, to longer engine
life. Because the engines have been operating more
efficiently, three to five percent gains in fuel economy
have also been realized. The chart below compares the levels
of wear particles present in the previous conventional oil
with the levels present in the AMSOIL as of May 2001. The
condition of the AMSOIL at various testing intervals is
documented below.
Conclusion
Overall, this field demonstration was highly successful for
AMSOIL. The oil analysis data indicate that AMSOIL products
deliver uncompromising protection and performance. AMSOIL
pro-vides longer equipment life and reduced downtime, longer
drain intervals, significant decreases in wear rates and
operating temperatures and dramatic improvement in engine
performance when compared to conventional petroleum oils.
|
Oil
Analysis - Bus #4 |
| |
Percent (%) of the
amount allowable |
Parts Per Million (ppm)
|
|
Mileage |
Viscosity
(100°C) |
OXD |
NOX |
TBN |
Fe (Iron) |
Pb (Lead) |
Cu (Copper) |
Al (Aluminum) |
|
0 |
15.2 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
12.0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
3883 |
11.6 |
7.8 |
4.3 |
12.7 |
17 |
1 |
2 |
7 |
|
5378 |
12.3 |
23.3 |
8.6 |
9.9 |
20 |
3 |
4 |
8 |
|
9700 |
14.0 |
4.4 |
7.1 |
13.0 |
40 |
2 |
4 |
8 |
|
22885 |
12.0 |
7.8 |
15.7 |
12.1 |
89 |
3 |
11 |
7 |
|
34059 |
12.4 |
21.1 |
15.7 |
12.4 |
134 |
5 |
30 |
12 |
|
45465 |
12.2 |
20.0 |
18.6 |
11.9 |
146 |
7 |
35 |
16 |
|
Oil
Analysis - Bus #7 |
| |
Percent (%) of the
amount allowable |
Parts Per Million (ppm)
|
|
Mileage |
Viscosity
(100°C) |
OXD |
NOX |
TBN |
Fe (Iron) |
Pb (Lead) |
Cu (Copper) |
Al (Aluminum) |
|
0 |
15.2 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
12.0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
3614 |
12.8 |
1.0 |
2.8 |
12.9 |
5 |
1 |
1 |
6 |
|
4126 |
13.6 |
3.3 |
4.3 |
9.8 |
9 |
3 |
3 |
7 |
|
10607 |
13.9 |
2.2 |
10.0 |
11.9 |
12 |
2 |
2 |
6 |
|
22428 |
12.9 |
10.0 |
10.0 |
12.2 |
30 |
5 |
27 |
8 |
|
31569 |
13.2 |
15.6 |
14.3 |
11.0 |
28 |
1 |
12 |
5 |
|
42647 |
13.6 |
25.6 |
18.6 |
10.6 |
61 |
12 |
38 |
9 |
|
58055 |
14.0 |
27.8 |
21.4 |
10.5 |
73 |
20 |
30 |
10 |
|
71185 |
14.2 |
17.8 |
20.0 |
10.7 |
53 |
16 |
14 |
6 |
|
Oil
Analysis - Bus #22 |
| |
Percent (%) of the
amount allowable |
Parts Per Million (ppm)
|
|
Mileage |
Viscosity
(100°C) |
OXD |
NOX |
TBN |
Fe (Iron) |
Pb (Lead) |
Cu (Copper) |
Al (Aluminum) |
|
0 |
15.2 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
12.0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
2732 |
13.4 |
1.1 |
2.8 |
7.8 |
7 |
2 |
12 |
6 |
|
3680 |
12.3 |
7.8 |
4.3 |
12.8 |
8 |
1 |
1 |
8 |
|
14329 |
12.5 |
5.6 |
10.0 |
12.9 |
14 |
4 |
3 |
6 |
|
20905 |
13.4 |
11.1 |
10.0 |
12.3 |
26 |
7 |
5 |
8 |
|
30671 |
12.8 |
6.7 |
11.4 |
9.1 |
28 |
6 |
6 |
7 |
|
41196 |
13.1 |
16.7 |
14.3 |
11.7 |
36 |
6 |
11 |
7 |
|
52983 |
13.7 |
21.1 |
15.7 |
11.2 |
44 |
7 |
19 |
7 |
|
65776 |
13.8 |
12.2 |
14.3 |
11.0 |
49 |
0 |
10 |
8 |
|
Oil Analysis Comparison: Petroleum Oil at
4,000 miles vs. AMSOIL Motor Oil at 45,465 miles
to 71,185 miles |
|
Vehicle |
Metal |
Type of Oil |
Parts Per Million |
Type of Oil |
Parts Per Million |
% Reduction |
|
Bus #4
|
Iron (Fe) |
Rotella
|
170 |
AMSOIL
|
146 |
-14% |
|
Copper (Cu) |
34 |
35 |
+3% |
|
Aluminum (Al) |
68 |
16 |
-76% |
| Lead
(Pb) |
26 |
7 |
-73% |
|
Average |
- 44%
|
|
Vehicle |
Metal |
Type of Oil |
Parts Per Million |
Type of Oil |
Parts Per Million |
% Reduction |
|
Bus #7
|
Iron (Fe) |
Rotella
|
126 |
AMSOIL
|
53 |
-58% |
|
Copper (Cu) |
42 |
14 |
-67% |
|
Aluminum (Al) |
98 |
6 |
-94% |
| Lead
(Pb) |
42 |
16 |
-62% |
|
Average |
- 70%
|
|
Vehicle |
Metal |
Type of Oil |
Parts Per Million |
Type of Oil |
Parts Per Million |
% Reduction |
|
Bus #22
|
Iron (Fe) |
Rotella
|
136 |
AMSOIL
|
49 |
-64% |
|
Copper (Cu) |
234 |
10 |
-96% |
|
Aluminum (Al) |
117 |
8 |
-93% |
| Lead
(Pb) |
39 |
0 |
-100% |
|
Average |
- 88%
|
|