| EP Additives (Statement from AMSOIL
INC.)
Q. An individual has posted a
message on an Internet message board that said AMSOIL motor oils
"lack sufficient EP additives" and the "quality of the product
has dropped" in the last few years. Due to lack of EP additives
and the the drop in product quality he "wiped out bearings,
pistons, rocker bushings, etc."
A.
No truth whatsoever. AMSOIL INC. has continually
improved the performance of its products over the years. The
best performing oil AMSOIL has ever made are the oils they make
today. In addition, new technology has allowed AMSOIL to improve
performance as the introduction of our Series 2000 oils
demonstrated. AMSOIL's standard products outperform the
competition and the Series 2000 products blow them away.
First of all, extreme pressure
(EP) additives are not typically used in motor oil. EP additives
are used in gear lubes and some greases. This is because they
contain sulfur or chlorine compounds that become active under
engine operating conditions. In this activated state they react
with the water found in by-products of combustion, and form
acids which are corrosive to engine components such as bearings.
Engine oils typically use
antiwear (AW) additives to prevent metal-to-metal contact within
an engine. These are commonly zinc and phosphorus compounds
(zinc dithiophosphate or ZDP). These additives are different
from EP additives because they activate or bond with metal
surfaces at lower temperatures and pressures and do not form
corrosive acids. EP additives are intended to withstand higher
pressures and temperatures than found in engines. AW additives
offer more than enough protection for all engine conditions
without any of the harmful side effects of EP additives.
AMSOIL INC. has always used
higher quality and a higher level of additives including zinc
and phosphorus than most motor oils on the market. The attached
tables compare the content of zinc and phosphorus of several
popular motor oils for passenger car and racing applications.
These additive contents were determined using spectrographic
analysis. Results could be verified for accuracy by submitting
unused oil for analysis to any independent oil analysis
laboratory.
|
ANTI-WEAR ADDITIVES
SPECTROGRAPHIC ANALYSIS: Passenger Car Motor Oils
|
| |
Zinc (ppm) |
Phosphorus (ppm) |
| AMSOIL Series 2000
Synthetic 0W-30 |
1599 |
1288 |
| Mobil 1 Tri-Synthetic
5W-30 |
1070 |
892 |
| Phillips 66 Trop
Artic 10W-30 |
922 |
784 |
| Pennzoil 5W-30
|
1170 |
905 |
| Quaker State 10W-30
4X4 Synthetic Blend
|
1078 |
856 |
| Castrol Syntec 5W-50
|
972 |
856 |
|
ANTI-WEAR ADDITIVES
SPECTROGRAPHIC ANALYSIS: Racing Oils |
| |
Zinc (ppm) |
Phosphorus (ppm) |
| AMSOIL Series 2000
Synthetic 20W-50 Racing Oil |
1675 |
1380 |
| Mobil 1 Tri-Synthetic
15W-50 |
1500 |
1174 |
| Quaker State High
Perf. Synthetic Blend 15W-50 |
1030 |
960 |
| Havoline Formula 3
20W-50 |
1085 |
834 |
| Castrol Syntec 5W-50
|
972 |
856 |
| Valvoline Racing
20W-50 |
1192 |
1077 |
Quantity of AW additives alone,
however, will not make one lubricant perform better than a
competitive lubricant. It's the combination of blended synthetic
basestocks with a perfectly balanced package of the highest
quality additives that allows AMSOIL to consistently outperform
the competition in all aspects, including wear protection.(NOTE:
Perfectly balanced means that using an aftermarket oil additive
will not improve and may actually harm the performance of AMSOIL
motor oils.)
Four Ball Wear
Tests from Independent Lab Tests demonstrate how effective
AMSOIL Synthetic Motor Oils are at wear protection compared to
other popular oils. The Four Ball Wear Test is a lubricant
industry standard (ASTM D 4172) test that compares relative wear
prevention characteristics of new lubricants at specified
conditions.
AMSOIL products clearly offer
better wear protection than competitive synthetics and much
better protection than conventional oils. Engines can fail due
to mechanical problems even when using AMSOIL. AMSOIL Motor
Oils, however, in over twenty-five years have never caused an
engine failure. If you ever hear someone say AMSOIL caused their
engine, bearings, pistons, etc. to fail, they are wrong.
Federal Mogul Corporation, a
manufacturer of engine bearings, pistons, connecting rods and
other engine parts, studied over 7,000 case histories of bearing
distress and engine failure and never found engine oil to be the
cause of a failure. Dirt, the number one cause of engine
failure, was found to be responsible for 43.4% of failures, and
insufficient lubrication, the second most common cause of
failure, was responsible for 16.6% of failures. Insufficient
lubrication is the general term used when not enough oil gets
through to the engine to lubricate it (lack of oil volume).
Some causes of insufficient
lubrication include oxidation, oil thickening, sludge, cold
temperature related dry starts, etc. These, however, are also
areas where AMSOIL motor oils out perform the competition. If an
engine breaks down with AMSOIL motor oil in it, it would have
broken down sooner using another oil! That's fact!
Back to Frequent
Questions Index Page |